GEORGE ZIMMERMAN FREE TO KILL AGAIN:
Little doubt, if Trayvon Martin had been white he'd be alive today.
But walking, driving -- doing anything -- while being black is clearly grounds for suspicion in the United States, a nation with one of the most dismal human rights records for people of a color.
In New York City, it makes you the target of the NYPD, who sees that nonwhite complexion as proof positive you're armed and dangerous, or else some dirty lowdown crack dealer.
Dark skin, dark eyes, dark hair ... yep, that's really all the probable cause needed in America.
Cops can stop you then, right outside your door, or at the bus stop, or on your lunch break, and, at the very least, subject you to a frisking.
Cops can stop you then, right outside your door, or at the bus stop, or on your lunch break, and, at the very least, subject you to a frisking.
In Florida, you could be but a youth, talking on a cellphone with one hand, carrying candy and a soft drink in the other.
Doesn't matter if those aren't deadly weapons; doesn't matter if you're where you're supposed to be; doesn't matter if you're doing nothing illegal.
Your race is menacing, your skin color a threat.
You can get stalked by a truly armed and dangerous nutter because of it. Assaulted even.
And, should you try to stand your ground and defend yourself from his attack, prevail in the ensuing battle, you can also get yourself shot to death.
It'll be okay, too, as far as the criminal justice system is concerned.
So long as your murderer isn't 'black'.
I have to agree with you. I do not think Zimmerman would necessarily followed a white boy and I am not biased by my own race as I am white. Why would he say THEY always get away? not hard to imagine who they is . Even if there was robberies by blacks in the neighborhood that is no excuse. besides it should not matter if he was black or any race for that matter. If someone disagrees they should consider this statment and see if it makes sense to them. - Zimmerman is innocent and this is a free country . - If that makes sense to them they need to have their head examined. Or maybe they just want a free country for a certain race or races
ReplyDeleteI think thats complete bullshit and martin got what he deserved for attacking zimmerman. If he was so innocent why didn't he just talk to z. and ask him why he was following him instead of attacking him? Live by the fist and die by the bullet, its the way the world has always been and will always be.
ReplyDeleteZimmerman said they always get away.
ReplyDeleteZimmerman assumed Trayvon was armed ,yet followed him
Following Trayvon was wrong and he made another mistake by never identifying himself as being with neighborhood watch.
Zimmerman created the conditions that led to the death of Trayvon.
to assume Zimmerman was guilty of suspicious activity enough to justify the above you would have to assume trayvons guilt in the first place. So what you really seem to be saying is Zimmerman is innocent until proven guilty but Trayvon is guilty until proven innocent and that is complete bullshit.
We know all Trayvon had was Skittles and iced tea so Zimmerman has zero reason to justify stalking Trayvon so no matter what the law says zimmerman made some mistakes. unless of course you do not believe in a free country for everyone
I disagree tennesse111. Watch this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ebu6Yvzs4Ls
Deletezimmerman follows Trayvon and you say the black guy should explain himself. yA different standard for the black guy huh?
ReplyDeleteCheck out drudgereport.com. This sh*t is getting ridiculous. Sharpton,Crunk and all the rest of the race baitors are just inciting people. This damn administration just wants to keep us divided as a country. God forbid we come together and all rise up against this out of control government. No,they dont want that. It's obvious.
ReplyDeleteBtw when it comes to this Trayvon/Zimmerman situation,I havent heard anyone say it better than this man:
http://rare.us/story/nugent-zimmerman-verdict-vindicates-citizen-patrols-self-defense/
That drudge report is nonsense. It does what I already mentioned-it assumes trayvons guilt in the first place.
ReplyDeletefrom the article
So George Zimmerman sees what he believes is a suspicious individual in suspicious circumstances, and intelligently and responsibly pays attention and calls 9-1-1 to report what he sees to the officials.
There is no evidence Zimmerman acted in a responsible and intelligent way. In fact just the opposite is true.
Vindicates citizens patrols? Another lie. Zimmerman assumed guilt and did not identify himself.
why do I even bother responding to liars? you really have to be a dishonest person to be biased like this in the first pace.
Zimmerman probably didn't use the best judgement that night by following the subject, but upon being assaulted he was within his rights to use lethal force in self-defense. There's really no account to go by but Zimmerman's, that of the witnesses (Martin's girlfriend didn't paint him in a good light), and injuries incurred.
Delete